New Issue!

Spring 2017 Issue ADDitude magazine Read the 'ADHD Therapies That Work' issue now!

The New ADDitude Forums Are Live!

Reach our full community by posting to ADDitude's discussion forums here

ADHD Adults

What to make of this... Interesting

As if we don’t already have enough to be self-conscious about.  Now I can start worrying about how often I blink…

Megan Brooks
August 20, 2014

- Eye May Be Key to More Accurate ADHD Diagnosis

A simple test examining involuntary eye movements may provide an objective
way to tell whether individuals have attention-deficit/hyperactive disorder
(ADHD) and whether stimulant medication will be an effective treatment, new
research suggests.

Investigators from Tel Aviv University in Tel Hashomer, Israel, observed
increased microsaccades and blink rates in adults with ADHD, which

normalized with methylphenidate treatment.

“We had 2 objectives going into this research,” lead investigator Moshe
Fried, PhD, from the Goldschleger Eye Institute, said in a statement. “The
first was to provide a new diagnostic tool for ADHD, and the second was to
test whether ADHD medication really works — and we found that it does. It
is certainly not a placebo, as some have suggested.”

The study was published
<> in the
August issue of *Vision Research.*

*“Striking” Predictive Effect*

“The rationale behind our study was following recent studies ― of ours and
others ― which found that the rate of microsaccades is inversely correlated
with the level of attention,” Dr. Fried told *Medscape Medical News.*

In this latest study, the investigators recorded involuntary eye movements
in 22 adults with ADHD with and without methylphenidate and 22 control
individuals while they performed the test of variables of attention (TOVA).

They found that unmedicated ADHD patients had significantly higher rates of
eye blinks and microsaccades compared with control participants. This
effect was largest in the peristimulus period, “where eye movements should
be suppressed because they could interfere with the task,” the researchers

In addition, stimulant medication had a “striking effect” on involuntary
eye movements, with full normalization of the microsaccade rate to the
control level and partial normalization of blink rates, mainly in the
peristimulus interval, they report.

“In order to develop a clinical differential diagnostic tool, a more
refined study should be conducted,” said Dr. Fried. “Specifically, patients
should be divided into subtypes ― for example, ‘inattentive’ vs ‘impulsive’
― and also the control group should be screened to exclude potentially
undiagnosed ADHD subjects.”

*“Promising” Diagnostic Tool*

“This is an interesting paper,” Emanuel Bubl, MD, from Albert-Ludwigs
University of Freiburg, Germany, told *Medscape Medical News.*

“The study has many strengths, starting with an easy approach to the
patient by investigating the visual system and documenting a normalization
after therapy,” Dr. Bubl commented.

“The results are in line with findings from animal research and human
studies where methylphenidate acts by stabilizing neuronal networks and
reducing background noise. The authors link their finding to the arousal
system, and there is good evidence that especially the dopamine system with
the dopamine-1 receptor plays a prominent role in ADHD,” he added.

“In my opinion, a diagnostic strategy, accessing the eye to find a
diagnostic tool, has a lot of potential to reach clinic and is a promising
tool for the future,” Dr. Bubl said.

In his own research, Dr. Bubl has found that examining the retina may aid
in the diagnosis of ADHD. As reported
<> by *Medscape Medidcal News*,
in a small study, he and his colleagues showed that patients with ADHD
displayed significantly elevated “background noise” on pattern
electroretinography compared with their healthy peers.

*The study was supported by the National Institute for Psychobiology in
Israel, the Charles E. Smith family, and the Israel Science Foundation. The
authors report no relevant financial relationships.*

*Vision Res.* 2014;101:62-72. Abstract


That is interesting. Some more crosschecking for perhaps other sensory systems responding atypically would be useful.

I have some degree of high sensitivity especially with sound and touch. My hearing is very acute. This can be very useful but also frustrating. Slight sounds can wake me from a deep sleep if they are ones some part of my brain on standby processes as needing a response. If this is an unknown sound or one that is something to be alarmed over I’ll wake up with an adrenaline rush. Fine if there is a needed response and glad to have it but not good when it is a normal enough sound such as a plane headed to the airport.

Visually this report is interesting as there was a period as a young child I was squinting very hard when blinking. This may have been the age when the AD/HD was triggering. Somewhere in that time period, I also was exposed to several possible triggers added in to the risk factors I’d had since before birth. One was having measles, mumps and chicken pox coming on consecutively for 3 weeks. I think the squinting came on sometime after that. And tapered off.

I can be easily distracted by some visual stimuli and notice details others may miss, mostly in novel situations and the mundane slow creep of accumulating papers and mail to sort through are just about invisible.

The micromovements could explain both the distraction as well as noticing what others miss. The brain’s refresh rate so to speak.

This could be very useful for dx and also checking medication efficacy.

Posted by Gadfly on Aug 22, 2014 at 1:59pm

Reply to this thread

You must be logged in to reply. To log in, click here.
Not a member? Join ADDConnect today. It's free and easy!

Not a member yet? Join here »

Search the ADDConnect Group Discussions